dxml 0.2.0 released

[Chris]

On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 19:47:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2018-02-12 17:49, Chris wrote:
>
>> How could it possibly make the situation any worse than it is 
>> now? Atm,
>> nobody will ever use std.xml, because it is sub-standard and 
>> has no future.
>
> I'm using std.xml in a new project right now. It's a really 
> small private project that just need to extracts some data from 
> an XML document. I started it a couple of days before dxml was 
> announced.

A few lines of code that could be replaced easily once something 
better is available? But who will start an important commercial 
project with std.xml when it says in red letters:

"Warning: This module is considered out-dated and not up to 
Phobos' current standards. It will remain until we have a 
suitable replacement, but be aware that it will not remain long 
term."

I for my part wouldn't and I'm glad there's dxml now.