Documentation for any* dub package, any version

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 02:07:34 UTC, Norm wrote:
> This is really awesome. It would be really cool if this could 
> feedback a coverage score to code.dlang.org that indicates the 
> level of documentation in a library. Something like the % of 
> functions/classes/modules that are documented and if there are 
> any missing parameters/warnings during the parsing of docs.

Maybe, though I don't think computer analysis can say if docs are 
good (at least not with simple code I'd be likely to write). Like 
there might be a lot of public functions deliberately 
undocumented because they are of alpha quality and not supported, 
but still available in case advanced users want to dive in.

But just having docs generated automatically that users can click 
on and peruse will give the human a chance to quickly and easily 
evaluate the package.