I have a plan.. I really DO

[SrMordred]

> But for technical aspect like performance, very honestly I'm 
> still not sure of its technical superiority over similar 
> languages.
>

> Just have a look at this one, which is quite famous :
>
> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/
>
> I know that many people here will simply tell me that all those 
> personal et external benchmarks are all wrong, etc.
>
> Maybe you are right.
>
> But in terms of communication, wouldn't it be much more 
> effective that the D experts of this forum simply fix the open 
> source code of those benchmarks to make D's technical 
> superiority much more obvious, so that the decision makers of 
> software development companies, which stupidly use the 
> informations of such benchmarks when investigating alternative 
> technologies, can more easily suggest to their leadership to 
> switch to D ?

I' quite sure that D can achieve performance equivalence with any 
other language. I don´t see any reason not to.

About that specific benchmark, not sure vibe.d had some updates 
since the first time I saw because I remembered people arguing 
here about why it was not that good on performance. Maybe now it 
will make better results.

And I agree about the communication part. Altough i like to see 
benchmarks and like to see the competition part of it their 
objective is just to point out that "we can do as much as these 
other guys can".

When benchmarks go slow people say that "benchmark is not 
everything or are wrong somehow".

But then when D get the fastest regex parser of the world, is all 
proud :)

But again, I believe that D can be performance competitive in any 
case.