Driving Continuous Improvement in D

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On 6/5/18 3:20 AM, drug wrote:
> 04.06.2018 21:08, Steven Schveighoffer пишет:
>> On 6/4/18 1:51 PM, Joakim wrote:
>>> On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 15:52:24 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>>> On 6/2/18 3:23 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> I like the article, but was taken aback a bit by this quote: "for 
>>>> example, a PR to fix a bug in a specific piece of code mustn’t also 
>>>> edit the documentation of that function."
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I think he was talking about _unrelated_ doc changes.
>>
>> Well, how unrelated? If, for instance, you are changing the docs to 
>> accommodate the new code, and notice a typo, I would be fine with 
>> fixing that, and have even ASKED for that. I guess I need a bigger 
>> clarification, as the way it reads is that we require people split 
>> their doc changes from their code changes, and that simply hasn't been 
>> the case.
>>
> 
> But what if your commit with this typo would be reverted? Then you lost 
> your typo fix too.

Then you fix the typo again? Reverts don't happen enough to justify this 
concern.

-Steve