Why think unit tests should be in their own source code hierarchy instead of side-by-side
Tony
tonytdominguez at aol.com
Fri Mar 23 22:42:34 UTC 2018
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 22:32:50 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 09:45:33PM +0000, Tony via
> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>> On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 20:43:15 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> > On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 19:56:03 UTC, Steven
>> > Schveighoffer wrote:
>> > > I've worked on a project where the testing was separated
>> > > from the code, and it was a liability IMO. Things would
>> > > get missed and not tested properly.
>>
>> That's where Test Driven Development comes in.
>
> That's not an option when you have an existing codebase that
> you have to work with. You basically have to start out with
> tons of code and no tests, and incrementally add them. Having
> to also maintain a separate test tree mirroring the source tree
> is simply far too much overhead to be worth the effort.
>
I think that you could "Test Driven Develop" the code you are
adding or changing.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list