Copy Constructor DIP and implementation
RazvanN
razvan.nitu1305 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 8 10:27:47 UTC 2018
On Monday, 8 October 2018 at 10:26:17 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> On Monday, 8 October 2018 at 10:14:51 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 09:26:34 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I just pushed another version of the DIP in which the major
>>> modifications among otthers are removing implicit and use
>>> copy constructor calls in all situations where a copy is
>>> made. For more details, please visit [1] and if you have the
>>> time, please offer some feedback,
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> RazvanN
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/129/
>>
>> I've made all the changes in the code that the DIP includes[1]
>> and the tests seem to be all green. I still need to add more
>> tests; if you have any tests that you want to make sure the
>> implementation takes into account please post them.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> RazvanN
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8688
>
> Both the DIP and the implementation still lack a -dip10xx
> switch.
After discussing with Walter and Andrei we came to the conclusion
that a flag is not necessary in this case. Immediately after the
DIP is accepted, the postblit will be deprecated.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list