Wed Oct 17 - Avoiding Code Smells by Walter Bright

[12345swordy]

On Wednesday, 31 October 2018 at 13:39:25 UTC, rikki cattermole 
wrote:
> On 01/11/2018 2:35 AM, 12345swordy wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 31 October 2018 at 13:28:54 UTC, rikki 
>> cattermole wrote:
>>> On 01/11/2018 2:25 AM, 12345swordy wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Because it is.
>>>
>>> My rules (which tend to be a little stricter than most 
>>> peoples) are:
>>>
>>> Soft split 1k LOC, hard split 3k LOC without a very good 
>>> reason not to.
>>>
>>> But at the end of the day, it just depends on the scope of 
>>> the module. Is it getting to large? If so, split.
>> Ok, you agree that it is subjective. Why is having more then 
>> one class per file "too large"?
>
> It doesn't. It is a group of related symbols. If it doesn't 
> have function bodies (e.g. extern(C++) or COM) I would call 
> that module to have too small of a scope.
Why do anyone have to create a file for every class if they 
wanted them to be encapsulated then? Why can't we put them in the 
same file if they are relativity small?