DIP Draft Reviews

[Mike Parker]

On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 14:30:14 UTC, rikki cattermole 
wrote:

>
> Last time I checked, it should be me and yshui's named 
> parameter DIP's next, they really need to be reviewed together 
> though, at least initially.

I'm not at all thrilled by the idea of running two DIPs through 
the queue in concert and would prefer to avoid that circumstance.

I've already discussed this with Yuxuan and asked if he'd be 
willing work together with you on a single DIP. His response was 
that the two proposals are not mutually exclusive and that yours 
could be built on top of his.

I need to take the time to fully absorb both DIPs and then I'll 
decide how to approach it. But you'll be hearing from me as soon 
as I do.