Copy Constructor DIP and implementation
scroodge
scroodge at evil.dot
Wed Sep 12 21:28:26 UTC 2018
On Wednesday, 12 September 2018 at 19:39:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> However, Andrei does not believe that the risk is worth it and
> insists that we need a way to differentiate between the new
> copy constructors and any existing constructors that happen to
> look like them. So, there won't be any kind inference here. If
> we were going to do that, we wouldn't be adding the attribute
> in the first place.
Andrei has a bad score in understanding what is best for
language. It's too arrogant, or scary, to listen to anyone:
that's about this ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAWA1DuvCnQ
For mockery, I would like to point out that the speaker of this
proposal has also exchanged "nogc" for "@nogc": throw the fears
into the sea, and fix the total nonsense that this language has
become.
Best wishes to the moderator.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list