Copy Constructor DIP and implementation

scroodge scroodge at evil.dot
Wed Sep 12 21:28:26 UTC 2018


On Wednesday, 12 September 2018 at 19:39:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> However, Andrei does not believe that the risk is worth it and 
> insists that we need a way to differentiate between the new 
> copy constructors and any existing constructors that happen to 
> look like them. So, there won't be any kind inference here. If 
> we were going to do that, we wouldn't be adding the attribute 
> in the first place.

Andrei has a bad score in understanding what is best for 
language. It's too arrogant, or scary, to listen to anyone: 
that's about this ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAWA1DuvCnQ

For mockery, I would like to point out that the speaker of this 
proposal has also exchanged "nogc" for "@nogc": throw the fears 
into the sea, and fix the total nonsense that this language has 
become.

Best wishes to the moderator.




More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list