Copy Constructor DIP and implementation

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 17:43:57 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
> If that where the case, then why not make it an actual keyword? 
> A frequent complaint regarding D is that there are too many 
> attributes, this will undoubtedly adding more to it.

When I (and surely others like me) complain that there are too 
many attributes, the complaint has nothing to do with the @ 
character. I consider "nothrow" and "pure" to be part of the 
problem and they lack @.