Copy Constructor DIP and implementation

[Manu]

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 00:55, Gary Willoughby via
Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 02:40:15 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
> wrote:
> > It appears that @implicit has been removed from the
> > implementation [1], but not yet from the DIP.
> >
> > https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/cdd8100
>
> Good, It's not needed.

@implicit is desperately needed (just not for copy constructors!).
Do you have confidence that an @implicit proposal will happen if you
all insist that it's removed here? This is a great driving motivator
to support @implicit's introduction.