interfaces and contracts - new pattern

Adam D. Ruppe destructionator at gmail.com
Tue Dec 3 13:00:49 UTC 2019


On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 at 10:39:08 UTC, Robert M. Münch 
wrote:
> In large scale projects this will become a big problem as you 
> can't assume that every developer knows about all the contracts 
> of a superclass.

That's the beauty of `override in(false)` - you don't have to 
know about the superclass. You can use it and it works in all 
cases.

Though that's also a possible argument for the language change.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list