interfaces and contracts - new pattern
Adam D. Ruppe
destructionator at gmail.com
Tue Dec 3 13:00:49 UTC 2019
On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 at 10:39:08 UTC, Robert M. Münch
wrote:
> In large scale projects this will become a big problem as you
> can't assume that every developer knows about all the contracts
> of a superclass.
That's the beauty of `override in(false)` - you don't have to
know about the superclass. You can use it and it works in all
cases.
Though that's also a possible argument for the language change.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list