DIP 1016--ref T accepts r-values--Formal Assessment
aliak
something at something.com
Fri Feb 1 14:31:48 UTC 2019
On Friday, 1 February 2019 at 11:48:51 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 01.02.19 10:10, aliak wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Shouldn't doubleMyValue(pt.x) be a compiler error if pt.x is a
>> getter? For it not to be a compile error pt.x should also have
>> a setter, in which case the code needs to be lowered to
>> something else:
>>
>> {
>> auto __temp = pt.x;
>> doubleMyValue(__temp);
>> pt.x = __temp;
>> }
>>
>> I believe this is something along the lines of what Swift and
>> C# do as well.
>>
>> Or something... a DIP to fix properties anyone? :)
>
> http://wilzbach.github.io/d-dip/DIP24
>
> I'm not sure your rewrite is good though, because it does not
> preserve aliasing during the function call.
You mean if __temp is modified in the doubleMyValue and pt.x
aliases something else? Or? Wouldn't the assignment back "just
work"?
And is there a rewrite that would work then?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list