DIP 1018--The Copy Constructor--Formal Review

[Olivier FAURE]

On Sunday, 24 February 2019 at 12:57:06 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
> On 24.02.19 11:46, Mike Parker wrote:
>> Walter provided feedback on Razvan's implementation. When it 
>> reached a state with which he was satisfied, he gave the green 
>> light for acceptance.
>
> Sounds like it might be a "worst acceptable proposal" [1] which 
> Andrei says the DIP process is supposed to avoid.
>
>
> [1] https://forum.dlang.org/post/q2ndr8$15gm$1@digitalmars.com

If I'm understanding correctly, Andrei said that about the 
proposals, while Walter gave feedback on the implementation, 
which is a little different.

But yeah, the proposal was clearly fast-tracked, probably because 
it's needed for reference counting and better C++ integration.