DIP 1018--The Copy Constructor--Formal Review

Andrei Alexandrescu SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Tue Feb 26 02:26:15 UTC 2019


On 2/25/19 6:09 PM, Olivier FAURE wrote:
> Yes, this DIP was fast-tracked. Yes, this can feel unfair. And yet, it 
> makes sense that it was fast-tracked, because it fits a priority of the 
> project owners (C++ interoperability + reference counting) and project 
> owners are allowed to have priorities. It's not like this DIP was rushed 
> or has major vulnerabilities (the "mutable copy constructor" thing is 
> necessary for reference counting).

I haven't heard the final decision from Walter yet, but I proposed that 
in the interest of quality, we will go through the customary two weeks 
reviews with DIP 1018.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list