DIP 1018--The Copy Constructor--Formal Review

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Tue Feb 26 03:44:01 UTC 2019


On 2/25/2019 3:09 PM, Olivier FAURE wrote:
> Yes, this DIP was fast-tracked. Yes, this can feel unfair. And yet, it makes 
> sense that it was fast-tracked, because it fits a priority of the project owners 
> (C++ interoperability + reference counting) and project owners are allowed to 
> have priorities. It's not like this DIP was rushed or has major vulnerabilities 
> (the "mutable copy constructor" thing is necessary for reference counting).

And yes, it underwent major rewrites as Razvan can confirm :-)


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list