DIP 1018--The Copy Constructor--Formal Review

[Walter Bright]

On 2/25/2019 7:17 PM, Manu wrote:
> break my DIP

The review process is not about "why not add this feature" , but "why should we 
have this feature".

Additionally, it is most assuredly about finding flaws in it. Isn't it best to 
find out the flaws before going further with it than finding them in the field?

As I mentioned before, it's supposed to be brutal. Any 
testing/certification/review process is about trying to break it.

It has (hopefully) nothing to do with how hard (or little) you worked on it, nor 
the cut of your jib, nor acceptance (or not) of mediocrity/merit in other DIPs.