DIP 1018--The Copy Constructor--Formal Review

Kagamin spam at here.lot
Wed Feb 27 14:30:31 UTC 2019


On Tuesday, 26 February 2019 at 05:38:01 UTC, Manu wrote:
> I'm talking about this DIP. Allowing a mutable copy argument 
> feels super weird.

The problem was out of place mutation, which can't happen with 
copy constructor, because initialization from rvalue is a move, 
so the copy constructor won't be called.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list