DIP 1016--ref T accepts r-values--Formal Assessment

[12345swordy]

On Thursday, 24 January 2019 at 09:47:46 UTC, Nicholas Wilson 
wrote:
> Given the simplicity of the fixes for the problems identified I 
> really don't think thats the best way forward. One round of 
> forum review + formal reassessment ought to be enough.
Yes, please! Let not restart the whole dip process for this! The 
DIP is very lengthy as it currently is, and just encourage the 
notation of "where good work goes to die" if this have to go 
through the process all over again.

-Alex