DIP 1016--ref T accepts r-values--Formal Assessment

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Thu Jan 24 23:43:21 UTC 2019

On 1/24/2019 1:31 AM, Manu wrote:
> This process is pretty unsatisfying, because it ships off to a
> black-box committee, who were apparently able to misunderstand the
> substance of the proposal and then not seek clarification, and despite
> the only legitimate issue from my perspective being easily corrected,
> it's been suggested to start a whole new DIP.

It's no problem if you want to rework the existing text, just submit it as a new 

More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list