DIP 1016--ref T accepts r-values--Formal Assessment
iamthewilsonator at hotmail.com
Fri Jan 25 12:03:36 UTC 2019
On Friday, 25 January 2019 at 11:56:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> It should never have gotten this far without giving a precise
> explanation of how exception safety is achieved when faced with
> multiple parameters.
The pot calling the kettle black. DIP1000? DIP1017?
Again, all that requires is a minor revision. It is not DIP
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce