DIP 1016--ref T accepts r-values--Formal Assessment
alexanderheistermann at gmail.com
Wed Jan 30 13:58:38 UTC 2019
On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 04:34:46 UTC, Don wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 03:01:36 UTC, 12345swordy
>> On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 00:25:17 UTC, Don wrote:
>>> But what I fail to see is why can't the programmer solve this
>>> themselves instead of relying on a new feature that would
>>> cause more harm?
>> ...Did you even read the arguments in the dip? This has been
>> discuss quite a lot in the forums, it even gives you links to
> Well, I read the DIP and the whole forum discussion back in the
> day, and again I think this will create more harm than benefits
> the way it was proposed.
I do not accept gut feeling as a valid objection here. The
current workarounds is shown to be painful as shown in the dip
and in the discussions that it currently link. That *the*
I am familiar with the author here, he is very involved with the
C++<->D compatibility side of things. He knows the pain from
first hand experience.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce