DIP 1016 should use expression lowering, not statement lowering

Nicholas Wilson iamthewilsonator at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 31 03:03:39 UTC 2019

On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 02:29:47 UTC, Steven 
Schveighoffer wrote:
> I came up with this idea based on tempCString, but it doesn't 
> work:
> So I don't get why it doesn't work. But if that was fixed, 
> could be a potential workaround without requiring a DIP.

Thats nice! But it doesn't fix the problem that in generic code 
you don't know without checking if you need to do that. Also the 
template bloat.

More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list