DIP 1016 should use expression lowering, not statement lowering

[Nicholas Wilson]

On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 02:29:47 UTC, Steven 
Schveighoffer wrote:
> I came up with this idea based on tempCString, but it doesn't 
> work:
>
> So I don't get why it doesn't work. But if that was fixed, 
> could be a potential workaround without requiring a DIP.

Thats nice! But it doesn't fix the problem that in generic code 
you don't know without checking if you need to do that. Also the 
template bloat.