DIP 1016--ref T accepts r-values--Formal Assessment
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Thu Jan 31 22:00:10 UTC 2019
On 1/31/2019 1:46 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> The proposal could actually disallow rvalues that have lvalue syntax, such as
> "symbol", "symbol[expr]", "symbol.symbol", "symbol.symbol[expr]", etc. Ugh. Gets
> hairy quickly.
That's why it's problematic to have a rule that rvalues can be implicitly
converted, but not lvalues. There's not a hard line between lvalues and rvalues.
For example,
foreach(i; 0..2)
{
int[] a = [1, 2];
assert(a[0] == 1]);
a[0] = 3; // will this cause the assert to fail?
}
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list