Release D 2.087.0

[Mike Franklin]

On Monday, 15 July 2019 at 13:06:58 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Monday, 15 July 2019 at 12:42:57 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
>> ... and are the exception, not the rule.  I believe they 
>> should be moved to `rt`.
>
> BTW, from this discussion it seems to me that you did not have 
> a good overview of the situation and made a bad decision based 
> on that. No problem there, however, throughout this discussion, 
> you've made a number of claims that have been refuted, and 
> instead of re-evaluating the situation, you've stuck to your 
> position while presenting continuously more radical 
> counter-arguments. At this point, I apologize and would like to 
> ask you to carefully consider whether you are trying to 
> neutrally argue for the best outcome to make D better, or 
> merely to continue supporting your position.

I'm not thoughtless and clueless, and I've acted in the best 
interest of D.

I asked for input from other developers before moving forward.  
They helped me understand that `rt` is where the core language 
features are implemented.  The code that I moved into `rt/array` 
initially came from `rt`, depends on implementations in `rt` and 
is the core implementation of D's built-in arrays, so it is 
perfectly logical for it to be in `rt`.  I submitted PRs that 
were scrutinized by the reviewers and merged.  Even after 
considering your arguments, I still believe I made the right 
decision.  I'm sorry you disagree and don't find my explanations 
convincing.

Mike