SAOC Experience Report: Porting a fork-based GC

[jmh530]

On Monday, 22 July 2019 at 20:57:19 UTC, Meta wrote:
> [snip]
>
> This seems like a major failure in the process that this was 
> allowed to happen - good work almost went abandoned. How can we 
> prevent this in future SAoC/GSoC? Without knowing what the 
> mentor did/didn't do, an obvious answer seems like there should 
> be a follow-up to ensure that the work done is actually getting 
> in to the compiler/runtime/etc. To go so far and trip right at 
> the finish line is unfortunate (glad to see that a PR is now 
> open).

I've been really liking the progress updates that the GSoC 
students are doing this year.