dud: A dub replacement

[Russel Winder]

On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 09:31 +0000, Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-announce 
wrote:
> On Monday, 18 November 2019 at 08:57:58 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> > Is SDL the right format? Cargo uses TOML to great effect.
> > 
> > And TOML has, I suspect greater traction more widely than SDL.
> 
> I personally prefer SDL when it comes to nested data, but yeah, 
> that would work as well.
> 
> The point I was making is to just have 1 format. With dud that 
> should be possible.

For me the argument is that SDL and TOML are intended for human's to write
configuration scripts, whilst XML and JSON are intended for computers to send
data to other computers.

-- 
Russel.
===========================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-announce/attachments/20191118/4b1d4902/attachment.sig>