dud: A dub replacement

Guillaume Piolat first.last at gmail.com
Fri Nov 22 15:37:08 UTC 2019


On Monday, 18 November 2019 at 16:54:21 UTC, JN wrote:
>> Personally I only ever use SDL with Dub. Even contemplating 
>> using JSON for human written configuration files is, for me, 
>> totally the wrong thing to do.
>
> I only use the JSON format. JSON is widespread together with 
> XML. SDL I heard first time of in the context of Dub and never 
> seen it used elsewhere. TOML also I know only from Cargo. YAML 
> at least I know from several different projects.
>
> I guess the tool must be working very well though if the main 
> argument is what kind of data format to use :)

I also only ever use JSON. When SDL was introduced, it was 
promised "JSON will never be deprecated". And here people are 
wanting to deprecate JSON as if SDL parsers were all that 
numerous.

JSON is the answer, SDL is the failed experiment that just bring 
disagreement :)

We DO parse dub.json a lot. I suspect any D organization probably 
does because dub describe is slow.

I don't care how "inhuman" a 20-line file is.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list