dud: A dub replacement
atila.neves at gmail.com
Fri Nov 29 13:29:33 UTC 2019
On Thursday, 28 November 2019 at 14:06:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
> On Thursday, 28 November 2019 at 13:10:44 UTC, Atila Neves
>> This is the done already by reggae. Unfortunately, since every
>> D module is effectively a header, the number of files that
>> need to be recompiled is usually large, despite the fact that
>> for most changes the recompilation isn't actually necessary.
> Do you think it might work if it did dmd -H and make the
> auto-generated .di file and then did a content-based change
> detection on them for recompiling dependencies?
Probably. In fact, I had a plan to do exactly that and measure to
see what the difference was. I just haven't gotten around to
doing it yet.
> It'd prolly still do more work than it has to, but seeing .d
> changed, rebuild .di, if .di changed, rebuild other stuff might
> just avoid full rebuilds upon just simple function body changes.
That was my idea as well.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce