DIP 1021--Argument Ownership and Function Calls--Formal Assessment

Mike Parker aldacron at gmail.com
Wed Oct 23 04:53:55 UTC 2019

On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 at 04:20:19 UTC, Exil wrote:

> it's a bad idea. Why have two community reviews? Those are made 
> with the assumption that the DIP will actually change between 
> the reviews.

No, that's not the assumption. You're conflating Community Review 
with Final Review. There can be multiple rounds of the former as 
required and only one of the latter. In a perfect scenario, no 
revisions are required between CR and FR. The purpose of the 
Final Review is to provide one final opportunity to catch any 
major issues that might have been missed during the CR round(s) 
and to allow anyone who missed the CR round(s) a final 
opportunity to have their say. Revisions are expected after a CR 
round, but not after the FR. As the documentation explains:


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list