DIP 1027---String Interpolation---Format Assessment

[Basile B.]

On Monday, 24 February 2020 at 10:02:26 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> I mean, people spend a lot of time thinking, making 
>> suggestions, etc. and the end result is: we now have nothing. 
>> Which, IMO is the worst result for all.
>
> Not at all. In this case, as the DIP author, Walter could have 
> chosen to revise the DIP with a new implementation. He chose 
> not to. He wasn't persuaded by the arguments in the thread.

Yeah, not to mention that in first place I think that he made a 
DIP for named args because the commuity was unable to formulate a 
good propostion, while he was himself not "pro-named args"... 
(maybe, I think i read this in the past)