DIP 1027---String Interpolation---Format Assessment
feepingcreature at gmail.com
Thu Feb 27 06:38:14 UTC 2020
On Thursday, 27 February 2020 at 03:50:35 UTC, Walter Bright
> On 2/26/2020 4:46 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>> But DIP1027 had a fatal flaw: it made type safety impossible.
> I don't see how that is true.
Because it turned a format string into a list of built-in types
indistinguishable from a set of manual parameters. You cannot in
principle tell the difference between "test $i" and ("test %s",
i) - you cannot write a function that takes a string and then
*any other type* and is also protected from being accidentally
called with a format string.
Features should be as simple as they can be, but no simpler. -
The point of simplicity is predictability. DIP1027 is so simple
that it crosses back into surprising.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce