unit-threaded v1.0.0

[Atila Neves]

On Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 19:01:22 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
> On Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 17:45:26 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> This last is sad, for me. I like using test functions rather 
>> than named unittest blocks.
>
> I recall playing with them when it was originally announced and 
> thought they were quite nice, but I haven't used them since.
>
> The unit-threaded library certainly seems chocked full of 
> features. Some of them overlap with the fluent-asserts library. 
> It may make sense to split off some of that stuff as well so 
> that people can evaluate custom assert libraries on their own 
> merits.
>
> Similarly, the mocking and integration stuff could probably (?) 
> be split off into separate packages. This would imply 
> unit-threaded could be focused on the runner subpackage.

The assertions are their own subpackage, as is the runner, and 
mocking, and integration.