DIP1028 - Rationale for accepting as is

Bruce Carneal bcarneal at gmail.com
Fri May 22 15:22:27 UTC 2020


On Friday, 22 May 2020 at 14:37:04 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
>
> I think the source of the problem is that Walter's DIPs require 
> the community to prove that Walter's proposal is so bad that he 
> needs to reject it. Anyone else's proposal has to prove that 
> it's worthy of being added to the language. There's a big 
> perceived gap between those two. As I've said many times, it's 
> odd for someone to judge his own DIPs, ...

When either Walter or Atila author a DIP, their spot in the 
"convince both or face rejection" duopoly could be taken by 
another person.




More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list