DIP1028 - Rationale for accepting as is
Bruce Carneal
bcarneal at gmail.com
Fri May 22 15:22:27 UTC 2020
On Friday, 22 May 2020 at 14:37:04 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
>
> I think the source of the problem is that Walter's DIPs require
> the community to prove that Walter's proposal is so bad that he
> needs to reject it. Anyone else's proposal has to prove that
> it's worthy of being added to the language. There's a big
> perceived gap between those two. As I've said many times, it's
> odd for someone to judge his own DIPs, ...
When either Walter or Atila author a DIP, their spot in the
"convince both or face rejection" duopoly could be taken by
another person.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list