DIP1028 - Rationale for accepting as is

[Paul Backus]

On Friday, 22 May 2020 at 19:16:26 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
> I for one liked it better when it had that aspiration. And I 
> was contributing towards that goal (latest PR was merged just 
> yesterday, coincidentally [1]).
>
> [1] https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/2773

Thank you for that PR, by the way. The new version of the spec is 
*much* clearer, and actually helped me find a subtle safety issue 
in my own code that I'd previously overlooked. I sincerely hope 
the D leadership appreciates how valuable this kind of work is.