DIP1028 - Rationale for accepting as is

[Dukc]

On Saturday, 23 May 2020 at 10:55:40 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> The more I think of Atila's and Walter's responses, the more 
> they are starting to make sense.
> [snip]

In fact this former antipattern means that it'd make sense to 
have an inverse of `@trusted` attribute, lets say `@suspect`. It 
would mean that the body of the function is verified just like 
`@safe`, but calling it is allowed only within `@system` or 
`@trusted` code.