DIP1028 - Rationale for accepting as is

Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net
Sun May 24 12:33:34 UTC 2020


On Sunday, 24 May 2020 at 09:47:37 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> It's a fair point, but without the source code the distinction 
> is meaningless.

It's meaningless in terms of what the compiler can check, but 
it's not meaningless in terms of documenting the assumptions and 
promises the developer is making.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list