DIP1028 - Rationale for accepting as is
NaN
divide at by.zero
Tue May 26 12:28:06 UTC 2020
On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 at 06:55:31 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev]
wrote:
> On Monday, 25 May 2020 at 23:39:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
>> [..]
>
> Thank you, Andrei, you've put this quite eloquently. With more
> than 200+ replies, unfortunately, this whole discussion looks
> like an excessively inefficient use of the community's time.
>
> One way to resolve this stalemate (which I've proposed in
> another post) is to split off the point of contention from
> DIP1028. In other words, amend the newly proposed compiler
> switch `-preview=safedefault` to not change the meaning of
> non-extern(D) function declarations and introduce a new
> compiler switch `-implicitly-{safe,trusted}-extern-fn-decls`
> (*) that adds the automatic "greenwashing" functionality that
> Walter desires so much.
If the greenwashing part was separated and delayed it would give
time to find out if Walters hypothesis about people just doing it
themselves is true.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list