DIP1028 - Rationale for accepting as is

[NaN]

On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 at 12:51:59 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 at 12:28:06 UTC, NaN wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 at 06:55:31 UTC, Petar Kirov 
>> [ZombineDev] wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> If the greenwashing part was separated and delayed it would 
>> give time to find out if Walters hypothesis about people just 
>> doing it themselves is true.
>
> -preview=safe now
> -revert=safe "tomorrow"

Does that separate "safe by default" from "c functions are 
assumed safe"?