Safety audit and the overlooked emergency exit
Bruce Carneal
bcarneal at gmail.com
Tue May 26 15:39:11 UTC 2020
On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 at 15:01:06 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
> [snipped an outline of tooling to mitigate 1028 damage]
>
> I think this would be a tool that adds real practical value and
> helps to reduce the cost of audits. And not the least,
> regarding the current discussion, it diminishes the importance
> of whether extern(C[++]) declarations are actually @system or
> @safe.
>
Yes. Tooling is good and will be much appreciated if 1028
stands. Reducing the need for tooling is even better.
@safe: the compiler checks
@safe post 1028: the compiler checks, sometimes, just not in the
scary parts
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list