Rationale for accepting DIP 1028 as is

[Timon Gehr]

On 27.05.20 11:34, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
> On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 09:09:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 5/26/2020 11:20 PM, Bruce Carneal wrote:
>>> I'm not at all concerned with legacy non-compiling code of this nature.
>>
>> Apparently you agree it is not an actual problem.
> 
> Really? I don't know if you really missed the point being made, or 
> you're being provocative. Both seem unlikely to me.
> 
> -- Bastiaan.

It's just selective reading and confirmation bias.

Walter did not read past the quoted sentence as it successfully 
slaughters the straw man he set up in his previous post.