DIP1028 - Rationale for accepting as is

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 5/27/20 9:42 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 09:50:50 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> Un-annotated C declarations should be a red flag to any competent QA 
>> team. Recognizing a false @trusted is a whole lot harder.
> 
> Is the actual problem those `@trusted:` declarations at the top of C 
> headers?
> 
> There could be a simple solution to that:
> 
> Ban `@trusted:` and `@trusted { }` which apply to multiple symbols. Only 
> allow `@trusted` to apply to a single symbol. For example:

Oh wow what an interesting idea. Thanks.