On Monday, 4 January 2021 at 01:19:12 UTC, jmh530 wrote: > On Sunday, 3 January 2021 at 20:31:41 UTC, welkam wrote: >> [snip] >> > [snip[ > Regardless, the DIP likely could have been improved by > mentioning its inclusion in C++ 11 (and perhaps focused a bit > less on implementation). Yes.