Discussion Thread: DIP 1039--Static Arrays with Inferred Length--Community Review Round 1

[jmh530]

On Monday, 11 January 2021 at 12:32:42 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> [snip]
>
> I think if the DIP proposed a literal syntax instead of a new 
> variable declaration syntax, it would be much less of a burden 
> to the compiler. I think we don't have any partial (variable) 
> type inference syntax ATM.
> [snip]

Could you provide an example? (apologies if you already have...)