Discussion Thread: DIP 1039--Static Arrays with Inferred Length--Community Review Round 1
Nick Treleaven
nick at geany.org
Wed Jan 13 15:36:09 UTC 2021
On Monday, 11 January 2021 at 20:25:14 UTC, Luhrel wrote:
>> I think if the DIP proposed a literal syntax instead of a new
>> variable declaration syntax, it would be much less of a burden
>> to the compiler. I think we don't have any partial (variable)
>> type inference syntax ATM.
>
> I don't think that will be complicated to implement, the
> compiler already says "mismatched array lengths, 2 and 1".
Ok, you're right. I still think a literal syntax is the more
natural way to do this though.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list