DIP 1035, "@system Variables", Accepted; DIP 1037, "Add Unary Operator ...", Abandoned

[Dukc]

On Wednesday, 13 April 2022 at 07:32:26 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> Walter and Atila have informed me that they have approved DIP 
> 1035, "@system Variables", on the grounds that it identifies a 
> loophole in the `@safe` checks and provides a reasonable 
> solution. Walter said it's a good DIP.

Yes. Despite my slight opposition to the DIP in the final review 
I can't say I'm disappointed. The DIP is still such a piece of 
art and the feature sounds nice to use, only a bit redundant 
(which is why I opposed it). Redundancy is not a showstopper 
after all.