DIP 1043---Shortened Method Syntax---Accepted

[Timon Gehr]

On 21.09.22 12:39, Mike Parker wrote:
> DIP 1043, "Shortened Method Syntax", has been accepted.
> 
> The fact that the feature was already implemented behind a preview 
> switch carried weight with Atila. He noted that, if not for that, he 
> wasn't sure where he would stand on adding the feature, but he could see 
> no reason to reject it now.
> 
> Walter accepted with a suggested (not a required) enhancement:
> 
>> It could be even shorter. For functions with no arguments, the () 
>> could be
> omitted, because the => token will still make it unambiguous.
>>
>> For example:
>>
>>     T front() => from;
>>
>> becomes:
>>
>>     T front => from;
> 
> As DIP author, Max decided against this. He said it's not a bad idea, 
> but it's then "inconsistent with other the other syntaxes". If there is 
> a demand for this, it would be easy to add later, but he felt it's 
> better to keep things simple for now by going with the current 
> implementation as is.

🎉

Great news! :)