DIP 1043---Shortened Method Syntax---Accepted
ag0aep6g
anonymous at example.com
Thu Sep 22 00:44:39 UTC 2022
On 21.09.22 12:39, Mike Parker wrote:
> The fact that the feature was already implemented behind a preview
> switch carried weight with Atila. He noted that, if not for that, he
> wasn't sure where he would stand on adding the feature, but he could see
> no reason to reject it now.
The benevolent way to read that is that Atila liked that he could easily
try out the new feature and judge it more fairly because of that.
The mean way to read it is that Atila employs some circular reasoning:
Accept the preview implementation, deferring to the DIP process to catch
a bad proposal. Accept the DIP, referring to the preview implementation
as justification.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list