Would this be a useful construct to add to D? auto for constructor call.

[ryuukk_]

On Tuesday, 23 January 2024 at 06:30:08 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> That being said, I expect that it would be pretty easy to write 
> a mixin to do something like that if you really wanted to. 
> Also, if you're simply looking to not have to name the type, 
> you could do
>
> dataGrid = new typeof(datagrid)(15);
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

You like to turn off people before they get the chance to develop 
further, this is bad

You should try more languages, it'll be eye opener

``dataGrid = new typeof(datagrid)(15);`` is both, verbose and ugly

Besides, you seem to have missed this:

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/e2ca557ab9d3e60305a37da0d5b58299e0a9de0e/DIPs/DIP1044.md

https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/14650

It could be expanded with structs/classes

So your "it can't be done" argument is already wrong