DMD-0.151 regressions

[Thomas Kuehne]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stewart Gordon schrieb am 2006-04-06:
> There seems to have been a surge of error results between 0.138 and 
> 0.144 - weird.  The regression report for 0.138 doesn't show any such 
> surge.  Have the numbers become mixed up?

0.138 introduced "-fPIC"

(neither documented in the changelog nor in DMD's help message, but
listed on http://www.digitalmars.com/d/html/d/dcompiler.html)

See also:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html#new0145

The numbers are correct - compare the summaries from
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dmd-0.137.html and
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dmd-0.138.html

Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFENUt73w+/yD4P9tIRAl3SAJ9igXKBQzo2+wZfXivwib8ETtx+hACeKjHa
8dIA+o3OIhCg2dKeFYOnYWQ=
=pAA1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----